Using JW Player Vs. Browser Native player
we are using an OVP and we can choose the player it serves in the console. (FlowPlayer, JW or custom).
-- The first problem is that they serve an older JW player (5.2).
-- The second problem, is that there are some issues in their implementation around dynamic watermarks.
I have 2 questions:
1. My ENG team decided they rather configure the system to serve native browser html player instead of JW 5.2. Can anyone help me with the pros/const of such decision?
consider that we do not support yet captions which is one area I know JW would be preferred.
2. any critical 5.2 -> 7 JW version wise that I need to be aware? consider that we do not need anything related to ads. This is for Enterprise video content.